<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="it">
	<id>https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso%2Fen</id>
	<title>La tradizione cavalleresca come via delluomo al rosso/en - Cronologia</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso%2Fen"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso/en&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-07-31T23:58:57Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Cronologia della pagina su questo sito</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso/en&amp;diff=3261&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiBot: Traduzione inglese automatica via DeepSeek di La tradizione cavalleresca come via delluomo al rosso</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso/en&amp;diff=3261&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-06-14T16:11:49Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Traduzione inglese automatica via DeepSeek di &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/La_tradizione_cavalleresca_come_via_delluomo_al_rosso&quot; title=&quot;La tradizione cavalleresca come via delluomo al rosso&quot;&gt;La tradizione cavalleresca come via delluomo al rosso&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nuova pagina&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Avviso|Wiki page dedicated to the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chivalric tradition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;way of man to the red&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the formulation of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Julius Evola&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Mystery of the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1937, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Revolt Against the Modern World&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1934). Chivalry &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a medieval historical ornament but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the main operative forms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the Western initiatic tradition: the knight is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Re-initiated&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in arms, the man present in action, the integration of Latin &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;virtus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + Greek &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;aretè&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; + medieval &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Complementary axis of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[I Fedeli dAmore|I Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (lay knights of the Inner Woman), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Stretta Osservanza Templare]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Templars as operative militia), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Mistero del Graal secondo Evola]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Quest as chivalric initiation), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Neo-Chevalerie nel XIX secolo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (late revivals). Main sources on Drive: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chivalric tradition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in English, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chevalerie&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in French, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ritterstand&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in German, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;cavalleria&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in Italian — constitutes, in the formulation of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Julius Evola&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Mystery of the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1937 and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Revolt Against the Modern World&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1934), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the main operative forms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Western hermetic initiation. It is not the medieval folklore of tournaments and heraldic shields (this is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the external mask&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), nor the 19th-century romantic ideology of &amp;quot;gentle chivalry&amp;quot; (this is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;its popular mythology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;). It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the way of man to the red in arms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the initiatic discipline of the warrior who transforms into a King, of the King who recognizes himself as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;node of the golden chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Alchimia e Magnetismo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. II), of the initiate who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;actively&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; integrates his virility by realizing it in the spirit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For the wiki cluster, the page serves as an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;operative synthesis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of a transversal axis that crosses many already published pages: the Templars as guardians of the Grail, the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore as a &amp;quot;Ghibelline militia&amp;quot; according to Dante, the 18th-century Strict Templar Observance, the 19th-century Neo-Chivalry, the Celtic-Arthurian chivalry underlying the Grail cycle, and — the pivotal point — the alchemical &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rubedo&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; read as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sacred kingship of the present man&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Risveglio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. VIII-bis).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I. The thesis: knight = man to the red in arms ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pivotal point articulated in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Risveglio|Il Risveglio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. VIII-bis: the alchemical &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rubedo&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;man present to himself&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Re-initiated&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Chivalry &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the operative form of this state — its historical incarnation in arms.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
For Evola, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King-knight&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; pair is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a single initiatic figure in two aspects&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the accomplished state, the integration achieved: &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;not with that [appellation] of &amp;#039;Saint&amp;#039;, but always with the warrior one of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, is designated by the &amp;#039;Sons of Hermes&amp;#039; he who has been &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reintegrated by the Art&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot; (Evola, KRUR 1929, cited in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Evola e Reghini e la Tradizione Ermetica]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Risveglio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;). The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;knight&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;active&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; phase that precedes and continues kingship — not as an instrument of the King but as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King-becoming&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; who continually tests himself in deeds.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Distinctive points of the initiate-knight:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Virtus + aretè&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — not &amp;quot;moral virtue&amp;quot; in a devotional sense but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;realized virility&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Lat. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;virtus&amp;#039;&amp;#039; from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;vir&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Greek &amp;#039;&amp;#039;aretè&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = excellence of being). The knight is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;excellent&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in his function — he fights, commands, decides, loves, guards — because he has &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;integrated&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; his virility in the spirit&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Armed wisdom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — chivalry &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;does not separate&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; contemplation and action. The knight &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;acts&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; while contemplating, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contemplates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; while acting. In chivalric legends, the deeds are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;simultaneously&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; feats and initiations&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Service and kingship&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the knight serves a King (earthly or celestial — Arthur, Christ cosmocrator, the ideal Emperor) but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is also&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a King in potential: the apparent paradox is resolved by the fact that the knight&amp;#039;s kingship &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is the kingship of Wisdom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. Dante&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Veltro&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sapienza, amore e virtute&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Woman as fulfillment&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the knight&amp;#039;s lady &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a 19th-century sentimental figure, she is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the transcendent part&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the knight himself awaiting him at the completion of the work (sec. III of this page)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== II. The three Evolian typologies: Olympian, Heroic, Titanic ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Evola in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Mystery of the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (ch. on the Bronze Age) and in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Revolt Against the Modern World&amp;#039;&amp;#039; distinguishes &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;three fundamental human types&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the initiatic tradition, in correlation with the four ages of tradition (Gold, Silver, Bronze, Iron):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 1. Olympian Type (Golden Age) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sacred sovereign&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the primordial Hyperborean tradition. King-pontiff (Lat. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;pontifex&amp;#039;&amp;#039; = bridge builder between the divine and human), integrally vigilant, integrally regal, integrally sacerdotal. It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the pure state of rubedo&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; without mediations: the Re-initiated &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;by nature&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;not by conquest&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In mythical texts: Krishna in the Bhagavad-Gītā, King Numa in the archaic Roman tradition, King Arthur before the wound, Prester John of the hidden eastern kingdom, Frederick II of Swabia according to Evola&amp;#039;s Ghibelline reading (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Mistero del Graal secondo Evola]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. IV).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 2. Titanic Type (Bronze Age) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The degraded opposite of the Olympian type. The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;pure warrior&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rebels&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; against the sacred sovereign, identifying with his material virility and using it against the spirit. Typical of the &amp;quot;descent into the Bronze Age&amp;quot;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Any insurgence of a wild and materialized virility against such spiritual forms characterizes the Bronze Age. This age is characterized by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the degradation of the warriors&amp;#039; caste and by its revolt against him who represents the spirit&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. [...] The Bronze Age is also marked by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the unleashing of the principle proper to the warriors&amp;#039; caste, namely, pride, violence, war&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The corresponding myth is the Titanic or Luciferian revolt, or the Promethean attempt to steal the Olympian fire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;». &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The age of the &amp;quot;giants&amp;quot;, or of the Wolf, or of the &amp;quot;elementary beings&amp;quot;, is equivalent&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The corresponding myths: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Titans&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; against Zeus in Greek mythology, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Lucifer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; fallen in the Christian tradition, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Prometheus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; stealing the fire, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Adam&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; eating the forbidden fruit, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the Giants&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the antediluvian Genesis. In every case: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;virility detached from the spirit&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that claims to replace the spirit.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== 3. Heroic Type (middle way) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;intermediate type&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the warrior who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recognizes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; his condition of the Bronze Age (no longer a sacred sovereign by nature), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;but does not surrender&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to Titanic degradation. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;He seeks&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Olympian reintegration through a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;double condition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;In order to implement a positive solution to the dilemma, that is, to attain an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Olympian transformation as the reintegration of the primordial state&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, it is necessary to fulfill a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;double condition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. First of all, it is necessary to show &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the proof and the confirmation of the virile qualification&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;; thus in the epic and knightly symbolism we find &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a series of adventures, feats, and fights&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. This qualification should not become a limitation, a hubris, a closure of the &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;, and it should not paralyze the capability of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;opening oneself up to a transcendent force, in function of which alone can the fire really become light and free itself&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Second, such liberation should not signify a [...]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;two Evolian conditions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the heroic type — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the double proof of the knight&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — are:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Prove the virile qualification&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; through &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;adventures, deeds, battles&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the knight &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;demonstrates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that he is not weak, cowardly, evasive. He has conquered his virility in the form of courage, perseverance, the ability to face death, physical and mental strength. This is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the work in black&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the chivalric path: the nigredo of the candidate who transforms into a knight by proving he can survive the trials&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Open oneself to a transcendent force&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; without the qualification becoming hubris, closure of the &amp;quot;I&amp;quot;, impediment to openness. The force the knight has conquered &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;transforms into light&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;only&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; if he &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;surrenders it&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to a higher principle. This is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the work in white and red&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the chivalric path: the transmutation of the warrior into the Re-initiated&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pivotal point: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the historical path of the heroic type&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The knight is not a sacred sovereign by birth (Olympian type — available only in the primordial tradition), he is not a secularized warrior (Titanic type — degraded), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;he is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the warrior who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recognizes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; his condition and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sets out on the path&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; towards Olympian reintegration.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Types of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;hero&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the tradition:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Heracles&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Greek) — paradigmatic figure for Evola: a warrior who, after the twelve labors (the proofs of virility) obtains &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hebe&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (divine youth, figure of the transcendent part) as his wife and ascends to Olympus&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King Arthur&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Celtic) — wounded-sleeping Olympian sovereign whose restoration requires the Grail Quest of the Knights of the Round Table&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Parsifal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Germanic, Wolfram) — hero who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;grows in innocence&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;der reine Tor&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;quot;the pure fool&amp;quot;), overcomes the trials, conquers the Grail — complete figure of the heroic type&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Galahad&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Christianized, late Breton cycle) — Christian version of Parsifal, &amp;quot;pure&amp;quot; hero who sees the Grail&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Cuchulainn&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Irish) — archaic Celtic hero&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Siegfried&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Germanic, Saga of the Nibelungs) — hero of the dragon-treasure-betrayal line&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Dietrich von Bern&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Germanic) — figure of Theodoric king of the Ostrogoths, hero of the Nibelung cycle&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== III. The Knight&amp;#039;s Woman ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Point developed by Evola in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Mystery of the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (ch. 6 «On the &amp;quot;Hero&amp;quot; and the &amp;quot;Woman&amp;quot;»). The knight&amp;#039;s woman — the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;lady&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the beloved, the promised bride — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a sentimental figure nor a biographical character. She is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the external figuration of the transcendent part of the knight himself&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, his &amp;quot;force of destiny&amp;quot; and victory.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hebe, the Olympian youth, was given in marriage to Heracles as a wife. In Egyptian figurations, divine women offer to the kings a lotus, which is a symbol of a rebirth and the &amp;quot;key of life.&amp;quot; Like the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Iranian fravashi, the Nordic Valkyrie are a figuration of transcendental parts of warriors, the forces of their destinies and victories&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The Roman tradition knew of a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Venus Victrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; who was credited with generating an imperial stock (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Venus Genitrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;); the Celtic tradition mentioned &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;supernatural women who take warriors to mysterious islands&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to make them [immortal]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The knight&amp;#039;s woman appears in all initiatic traditions:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hebe&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Olympian bride of Heracles after the apotheosis&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fravashi&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — in the ancient Iranian tradition, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;transcendent part&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the warrior individual, his &amp;quot;celestial matrix&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Valkyries&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — in the Nordic tradition, female figures who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;choose&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; fallen warriors to lead them to Valhalla&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Venus Victrix / Venus Genitrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — in the Roman tradition, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;imperial figure&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of victory and the generation of royal lineages&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Celtic women of the mysterious islands&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Morgana, the Lady of the Lake, Niniane — who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;take away&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the warrior towards Avalon&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Beatrice / Pargoletta / Selvaggia / Donna Unica&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore — see &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[I Fedeli dAmore]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for the complete treatment&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Isis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Myriam&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; / &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sophia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Marian-Isiac figures of the Italian magnetic-hermetic tradition (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Kremmerz e Ordine Osirideo Egizio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Operative point: the knight&amp;#039;s lady &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a biographical woman. She is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one&amp;#039;s own luminous part&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; awaiting reunion — the hermetic &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rebis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, the alchemical androgyne (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Evola e Reghini e la Tradizione Ermetica]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. III). The &amp;quot;conquest&amp;quot; of the lady by the knight is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the final coniunctio&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the work in red. Cecco d&amp;#039;Ascoli (Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore): &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Dunque io sono Ella»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — explicit formulation of the final convergence between knight and lady (= between initiate and his own transcendent part).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Evola also emphasizes the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;danger&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the lady: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[when the woman&amp;#039;s possession means] danger that a heroic adventure can lead to a titanic fall. In this case, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the woman represents the seductiveness of transcendent power and knowledge when its possession means [violation of the order]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;». The knight who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;conquers&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the lady in the wrong way (with violence, with hubris, outside the initiatic design) falls into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Titanic hybris&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; instead of realizing the Olympian transformation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Important operative point for the School: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the relationship with the woman&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the chivalric tradition is a rigorous &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;initiatic operation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, not romantic liberality. The lady must be &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recognized&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (not confused with the ordinary woman), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;honored&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (not seduced), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;served&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (not possessed), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;conquered&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (through one&amp;#039;s own trials, not through her submission).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IV. The chivalric cycles: operative symbols ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chivalric tradition produced, between the 12th and 14th centuries, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a vast initiatic literature&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which — as Reghini and the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore have shown (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[I Fedeli dAmore]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. II-III) — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;must be read as a coded text&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of a living initiatic school, not as courtly literature in the modern sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Arthurian-Breton cycle ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Arthurian cycle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (King Arthur, Knights of the Round Table, Quest for the Grail, Lancelot, Galahad, Percival, Gawain, Mordred) constitutes &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the most complete matrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Western initiatic chivalry. Operative centers:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;King Arthur&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Olympian sovereign wounded-sleeping in Avalon, awaiting restoration. Figure of the decadent Olympian type who requires the Quest of his knights to restore him. Cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Mistero del Graal secondo Evola]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. IV (Arthur in the initiatic series with Frederick II, Prester John, Dante&amp;#039;s Veltro)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Round Table&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — geometric figure of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;initiatic Lodge&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: 12 (or 24, 50, 150 according to the versions) knights around Arthur sharing a common state. Convergent with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Arthurian antecedent of the Masonic lodge chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Quest for the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — initiatic operation to bring back sacred sovereignty. The knights who leave the court and cross the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Adventurous Forest&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (figure of the astral plane, the dimension of trial) to reach the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Castle of the Fisher King&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fisher King (Roi Pêcheur)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the only character who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;knows&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the Grail but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is wounded&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (inguinal wound = sterility of the kingdom = decadence of the Age). Only the pure knight who asks the right question heals him&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«The right question»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — in Chrétien&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Perceval&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the knight must ask: &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Whom does the Grail serve?&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;. The question is an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;initiatic operation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: recognizing that the Grail &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;serves&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (= has a recipient, a cosmic function), it &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (a fetish-object in itself). Percival&amp;#039;s error: not asking when he first sees the Grail. Consequence: the kingdom remains sterile&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Carolingian cycle (Chanson de Roland, Orlando) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Carolingian cycle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Orlando, Rinaldo, Olivier, Ganelon — is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;less initiatic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; than the Breton one (more historical-heroic-religious), but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;preserves&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; elements:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Orlando paladin of Charlemagne&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — hero who dies alone at Roncesvaux, figure of the warrior&amp;#039;s sacrifice for the imperial cause&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Durendal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Orlando&amp;#039;s sacred sword, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;consecrated object&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that identifies him as an initiate-knight&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oliphant&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the horn that calls the emperor, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;word of the knight&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to the celestial sovereign&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the Renaissance, the Carolingian cycle was &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reworked in an initiatic key&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Ariosto (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Orlando furioso&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1516-1532) and Tasso (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gerusalemme liberata&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1581) — both in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Italian&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; environments with explicit hermetic accents. In the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Orlando furioso&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Orlando&amp;#039;s madness for Angelica is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;symbolic reading&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the warrior who falls into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Titanic hybris&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; before the lady.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Nibelung cycle (Germanic) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Germanic cycle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Siegfried, Brunhild, the Nibelungs, Dietrich von Bern — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is the most tragic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the three major cycles. Siegfried obtains the treasure and the lady, but is betrayed and killed. Initiatic reading: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the knight who does not correctly integrate&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; his conquest — his success becomes an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;occasion for betrayal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the ruin of the entire kingdom.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The major late work — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Richard Wagner&amp;#039;s&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ring des Nibelungen&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1848-1874) — is an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;explicit initiatic re-reading&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the Germanic material in the 19th century. Wagner also integrates Parsifal (1882) with Templar-Rosicrucian elements that attracted Nietzsche&amp;#039;s attention (positive until 1872, polemical after). Cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Neo-Chevalerie nel XIX secolo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for context.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V. The Templars as organized initiatic Chivalry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Important axis for the cluster: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Knights Templar&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Order of the Temple, founded in Jerusalem in 1118, suppressed in 1314 by Philip the Fair with the complicity of Clement V) are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the organized initiatic chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the medieval Christian tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Operative points (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Stretta Osservanza Templare]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for the complete historical treatment):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Double structure&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — external (military-religious order in the service of the King of Jerusalem and then the Papacy) + internal (initiatic school with symbols, rituals, and a chain of transmission)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Material wealth&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the Templars became &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the first international bankers&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Europe. The Order&amp;#039;s wealth is an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;operative&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; element (it allows for sustenance, crusades, commanderies, constructions) but also a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;cause&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of its suppression (Philip the Fair suppressed them to appropriate their treasure)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Architecture&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the Templars built &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;round churches&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Temple Church in London, Temple in Paris, etc.) in imitation of the Temple of Jerusalem. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Roundness&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a figure of perfection, the Round Table, the lodge chain&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Connection with the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Wolfram explicitly places the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Templeisen»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as guardians of the Grail in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Parzifal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sie lebent von einem steine&amp;#039;&amp;#039;», they live from a stone (the Grail itself as a &amp;quot;stone of light&amp;quot;). Cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Mistero del Graal secondo Evola]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. VI on the Templar-Grail-Ghibellinism identity&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Hidden continuity&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the suppression of 1314 &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;does not close&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the tradition: the survivors &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;take refuge&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in various ways (in Scotland according to one legend, in other orders according to other versions). The 18th-century &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Strict Templar Observance&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Stretta Osservanza Templare|von Hund]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1751) and other Lodges claim an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;unbroken chain of transmission&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; from the Templars of 1314&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VI. Dante and the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore as Spiritual Chivalry ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pivotal point documented by Reghini and Evola (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[I Fedeli dAmore|I Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. III and VII): the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the 13th-14th century Italian-Provencal-Belgian area &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;are a form of spiritual chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; even if not military. The knight of the Fedeli &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;no longer carries arms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;carries the pen&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as an instrument of coded initiation.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Ch. 26 of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Mystery of the Grail&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is explicitly titled «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Dante and the Love&amp;#039;s Lieges as a Ghibelline Militia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;» — Dante and the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;are&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a &amp;quot;Ghibelline militia&amp;quot; in the literal sense: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a secret chivalric organization&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that continues the Templar-Grail chivalry after its suppression in 1314 (the repression of the Templars is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contemporary&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; with the composition of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Commedia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the texts of the Fedeli — Dante in his canticles strikes at Philip the Fair as responsible for the suppression).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The spiritual chivalry of the Fedeli:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The weapon&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;coded word&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Stilnovist poetry read as code)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The lord&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;ideal Emperor&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Ghibelline program) or &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Christ cosmocrator&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (theological program)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The lady&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;divine Wisdom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Beatrice, Pistis Sophia, Donna Unica)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The deeds&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;coded ascents&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the Commedia, the internal &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;threshold-events&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; described as real encounters&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VII. The sword as an operative symbol ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Transversal point for the cluster: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sword&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the main symbolic-operative object&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of initiatic chivalry. It is not just a weapon — it is the knight&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;seal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;constant reminder&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of his condition, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;instrument&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of trial.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Aspects:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The sword in the stone&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Arthurian Excalibur) — only the legitimate King can draw it. Initiatic figure of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;verification&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recognizes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the pure knight&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The sword from the stone&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that comes from heaven (Grail cycle) — the sword as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;gift from Above&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, not as human fabrication&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The broken sword to be reforged&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Narsil/Andúril, present in various traditions) — figure of the knight who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reforges&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the broken kingship. The sword is reforged &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;when the knight is ready&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Durendal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Orlando — sacred sword that the knight &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;cannot separate&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; from himself&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The Master&amp;#039;s naked sword&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in 18th-19th century Masonic rituals — the sword present &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;without being used&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in lodge works (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Technical point: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;sword&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a figure of the knight&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;discriminating will&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. A will that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;cuts&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (not in the sense of violence but of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;clear separation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; between the true and the false, the essential and the accessory), that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;protects&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the King, the lady, the kingdom), that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;consecrates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the youth into a knight by investiture, the new initiate by the Master).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VIII. Chivalry in Egyptian Masonic rites ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Initiatic chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a central element of the 18th-19th century Egyptian Rite, in particular:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Cagliostro e il Rito Egizio|Rite of Cagliostro]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the Cagliostrian initiate at the high degrees is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;knight of the Sagesse Triomphante&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, receives investiture with the sword, receives an initiatic chivalric name&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massoneria Egizia e Magnetismo|Rite of Misraïm]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (87°-90°, cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Arcana Arcanorum]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) — the system makes explicit reference to chivalry&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Stretta Osservanza Templare]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of von Hund (1751) — explicit Templar chivalric degrees&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Neo-Chevalerie nel XIX secolo|Neo-Chevalerie]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the 19th century — late revivals&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The investiture of the knight — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;colée&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (blow of the flat of the sword on the shoulder) — is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;true initiatic ritual&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the high lodges: transmission of the magnetic fluid of the Master to the neophyte through the sword as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;conductor&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Alchimia e Magnetismo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. XII.2 on vital fluids in the UR/KRUR volumes).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IX. Chivalry and Awakening: the chivalric rubedo ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Pivotal point that reconnects this page to the cluster&amp;#039;s theme-axis (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Risveglio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;):&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the operative forms of rubedo&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the work in red in arms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The accomplished knight is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the man present in action&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: not an ascetic withdrawn from the world, not a mystic dissolved in passive contemplation, but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a man&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; who &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;operates in the world&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; while remaining &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;awake&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The chivalric path is particularly significant for the cluster because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;It integrates action and contemplation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the knight is neither the monk nor the magician. He fights, governs, loves, builds — but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;consciously&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;presently&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;initiated&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. It resolves the false dualism &amp;quot;action-contemplation&amp;quot; which is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the diseases of degenerated spirituality&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;It preserves the virile dimension&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — important point for Evola: initiation &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;does not&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; depower virility (error of the lunar path, of passive religiosity, of feminizing devotional piety) — it &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;realizes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; it in its highest form. The King-knight &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; virile, in the full sense of the term&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;It works with the body&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — differently from Wolinsky (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Wolinsky e la deconcettualizzazione]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. II), the chivalric path &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is eminently corporeal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. The knight &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;trains&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (weapons, horsemanship, endurance), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;disciplines&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (diet, sleep, rule), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;exposes himself to trials&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (battles, journeys, pilgrimages). The body is not just the athanor of transmutation: it is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;instrument of initiatic action in the world&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;It integrates with spiritual chivalry&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore (chivalry of the word), the Templars (chivalry of the Order), the Grail cycle (mythical chivalry of the Quest) are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;three extensions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the same path. The Paret-ISI-CNV School operates primarily on the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;hermetic-magnetic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Kremmerzian path but recognizes in spiritual chivalry &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;an operative model&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of reference&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The realized knight is not the warrior of the Bronze Age (Titanic). He is not the monastic saint (lunar-passive, according to the Evolian diagnosis). He is not the abstract philosopher (intellectual detached from life). He is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the man to the red in arms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the initiate &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;who acts&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the world while remaining &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;awake&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;aware&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that the kingship he exercises is not &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;his individually&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; but is the kingship of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;universal Consciousness&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; operating through him.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X. Living practice in the School ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Declared section: living practice of the Paret School (ISI-CNV).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The School recognizes the chivalric tradition as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the main operative models&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the Western initiatic path. While not being a chivalric order (the School is hermetic-magnetic in the Kremmerzian line), it integrates chivalric elements into its own practice:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The principle of the Evolian double condition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the student is invited to (a) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;prove&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; his qualification (responsibilities assumed and maintained, organized life, mastery of one&amp;#039;s states, ability to face one&amp;#039;s weaknesses) + (b) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;open oneself&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to a transcendent force (not identify with one&amp;#039;s personal strength, recognize that the consciousness that operates is universal)&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The relationship with the Lady&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — recognition of the inner luminous part as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one&amp;#039;s own Lady&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Isis-Myriam-Beatrice in the different formulations). The practice rejects both &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;womanizing&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (consumption of women as objects) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;lunar pietism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (passive submission to the woman as divine mother). The Lady is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one&amp;#039;s own&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; transcendent part that demands &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;honor&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;service&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, not worship nor conquest&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The inner sword&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the student cultivates the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;discriminating will&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a working tool: clearly say yes or no, distinguish the true from the false, cut what is not needed, protect what is essential&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The integration of body + action&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the School&amp;#039;s practice is not only meditative: it includes physical training, discipline of the body, exposure to the world, operative action (cf. Kremmerz&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Avviamento alla Magia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Alchimia e Magnetismo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sec. XII.3)&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The way of man to the red in arms&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the underlying orientation: realize the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;rubedo&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;in the world&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, not &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;outside&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the world. The initiate of the School operates in the profession, in relationships, in civil life — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;remaining awake&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;remembering&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that the kingship he exercises is the kingship of Wisdom&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The memory of the chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the School places itself in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Italian chivalric chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (in a symbolic, not ordinistic sense): Frederick II of Swabia, the Ghibellines, Dante, the Fedeli d&amp;#039;Amore, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica|Palombara]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the cenacle of Christina of Sweden, Cagliostro in Lyon, Kremmerz in Naples. The ideal continuity of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;seven centuries&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Italy is a constant &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;spiritual reference&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== XI. Paul-Georges Sansonetti — the alchemical-imaginal reading of Perceval ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Paul-Georges Sansonetti — author of the same current of thought as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Robert Giudicelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[La Doctrine du Corps Immortel]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Rémi Boyer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Arcana Arcanorum]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Lavoro sui Quattro Corpi dellUomo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) — published in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;2002&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Éditions ARMA-Édire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Menton (the same publishing house as Giudicelli and part of Boyer&amp;#039;s work) the book &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chevalerie du Graal et Lumière de Gloire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (607 KB of text, a paper edition of over 600 pages), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the systematic reading of Chrétien de Troyes&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Perceval&amp;#039;&amp;#039; according to a double alchemical-imaginal key&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Pivotal page for the wiki cluster on chivalry because:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the most complete modern doctrinal source&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on initiatic chivalry read as an operative school&lt;br /&gt;
* It is published in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Édire-ARMA current&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the same as Giudicelli, Boyer, and other Francophone authors of the living initiatic tradition)&lt;br /&gt;
* It constitutes the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;theoretical basis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the operative path of the Chevalerie Spirituelle practiced today (sec. XII of this page)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Origins and method ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Sansonetti&amp;#039;s preface declares: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ce livre a pour origine &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;un travail de doctorat&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; relevant de la Littérature comparée présenté en mars 1980 à l&amp;#039;Université des Lettres de Grenoble. D&amp;#039;éminents chercheurs composaient le jury: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gilbert Durand&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, alors président et fondateur du &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Centre de Recherche sur l&amp;#039;Imaginaire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Madame Simone Vierne, qui devait lui succéder à la direction de cette institution et Jacques Ribard, doyen de l&amp;#039;Université de Picardie&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The book is therefore a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1980 doctoral thesis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, refined and published 22 years later. The double methodological key:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Gilbert Durand&amp;#039;s Anthropological Structures of the Imaginary&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — a tool of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;comparative mythology&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that organizes all images produced by the human psyche into &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;three Regimes of the Image&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Diurnal-heroic, Nocturnal mystical, Nocturnal synthetic-dramatic)&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alchemical thought&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — reading of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Perceval&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a coded text of the Great Work, with its sequence of colors, trials, substances, states&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
To these two keys, Sansonetti adds &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Indo-European traditions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (particularly &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Celtic and Germano-Scandinavian&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Christian symbolism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as complementary interpretative materials.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The five chapters and the structure of the Magistery ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The work is in five chapters that reconstruct &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the initiatic path of Perceval&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in Chrétien&amp;#039;s text:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;CHAPITRE PREMIER: Vision du Vermeil&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;vision of the Vermilion&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (red). Pivotal point: the drop of blood fallen on the snow, contemplated by Perceval, is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the first alchemical revelation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the red = of the royal color = of the completed work. Sansonetti reads it as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;visual anticipation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Diurnal Regime) of the ultimate term of the journey&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;CHAPITRE II: La Lumière et l&amp;#039;Épée&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Light and Sword&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Perceval&amp;#039;s sword (given by the Fisher King, broken, to be reforged) is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;device of the discriminating will&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. sec. VII of this page). The light revealed to the knight is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the Lumière de Gloire&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the Iranian tradition (Xvarnah, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Glanz&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) documented by Henry Corbin — the luminous source that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;recognizes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the legitimate sovereign&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;CHAPITRE III: Perception d&amp;#039;un autre corps&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;perception of another body&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Direct convergence with the page &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Il Lavoro sui Quattro Corpi dellUomo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the cluster. Perceval, going through the trials, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;perceives that he is other&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; than the ordinary material body: he discovers his own &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;subtle body&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (lunar-aerial-luminous). Sansonetti explicitly links this section to the Norse tradition of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;multiple bodies&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (hamr as &amp;quot;subtle form or garment&amp;quot;, hamingja as &amp;quot;spirit attached to the individual&amp;quot;, fylgja as &amp;quot;female guide double&amp;quot; — cf. sec. XII of this page)&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;CHAPITRE IV: Formes et Puissances&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Forms and Powers&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Catalog of the entities the knight encounters and dialogues with (magical animals, supernatural women, hermits, guardians of the Grail). Sansonetti analyzes the Nordic &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;hamr / hamingja / fylgja&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as technical tools for reading these figures&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;CHAPITRE V: Gen&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>