<?xml version="1.0"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xml:lang="it">
	<id>https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista%2Fen</id>
	<title>Athanasius Kircher SJ alchimista e magnetista/en - Cronologia</title>
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?action=history&amp;feed=atom&amp;title=Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista%2Fen"/>
	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista/en&amp;action=history"/>
	<updated>2026-06-16T02:22:40Z</updated>
	<subtitle>Cronologia della pagina su questo sito</subtitle>
	<generator>MediaWiki 1.43.3</generator>
	<entry>
		<id>https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista/en&amp;diff=2681&amp;oldid=prev</id>
		<title>WikiBot: Traduzione inglese automatica via DeepSeek di Athanasius Kircher SJ alchimista e magnetista</title>
		<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://wiki.marcoparet.com/index.php?title=Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista/en&amp;diff=2681&amp;oldid=prev"/>
		<updated>2026-06-14T15:10:12Z</updated>

		<summary type="html">&lt;p&gt;Traduzione inglese automatica via DeepSeek di &lt;a href=&quot;/wiki/Athanasius_Kircher_SJ_alchimista_e_magnetista&quot; title=&quot;Athanasius Kircher SJ alchimista e magnetista&quot;&gt;Athanasius Kircher SJ alchimista e magnetista&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;Nuova pagina&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;div&gt;{{Notice|Page of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;17th-century historical section&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the wiki. Documents &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Athanasius Kircher SJ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Fulda 1602 — Rome 1680), German Jesuit, polymath of the Roman College, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;member of Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s circle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; together with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica|Palombara]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Santinelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;alchemical master of Palombara and [[Francesco Giuseppe Borri|Borri]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, author of three fundamental treatises on magnetism that anticipate Mesmer by a century and a half. Hinge-page for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;alchemy-magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; node in the cluster. Main source: Anna Maria Partini, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Athanasius Kircher e l&amp;#039;Alchimia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Mediterranee, Rome, 2010 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (OCR text on Drive).}}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Athanasius Kircher&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Fulda, Hesse, 12 May 1602 — Rome, 28 November 1680), German Jesuit who entered the Society of Jesus on 2 October 1618, was &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the most encyclopedic mind of the 17th century Europe&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: mathematician, physicist, Egyptologist, sinologist, vulcanologist, musicologist, alchemist, magnetist. Called to Rome by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Urban VIII&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in 1633 to teach mathematics, physics and oriental languages at the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Roman College&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, he spent most of his life there producing a vast body of work — over 40 published treatises. For the wiki cluster, he is a threefold hinge-figure: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(1)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; he is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;member of Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s circle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in Rome together with &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica|Palombara]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Santinelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Confraternita dellAurea Rosacroce]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; sect. VII); &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(2)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; he is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;alchemical master of Palombara and [[Francesco Giuseppe Borri|Borri]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — documented in Partini; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;(3)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; he is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;most systematic theorist&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of magnetism as a universal «golden chain», expounding in three treatises a doctrine that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;anticipates by 150 years&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Mesmer&amp;#039;s formulation (1779). On Kircher, the wiki therefore has a pivotal page for the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;alchemy-magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; node, which is one of the cluster&amp;#039;s axes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== I. Life and context ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Anna Maria Partini reconstructs: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Learned mathematician of eclectic culture, Athanasius Kircher &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;was born in Germany near Fulda on 12 May 1602&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Entering the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Society of Jesus on 2 October 1618&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, he taught mathematics and oriental languages first in Germany and then in France. Called to Rome by &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Urban VIII&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in 1633 to teach mathematics, physics and oriental languages, he spent most of his life at the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Roman College&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Essential biographical milestones:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1602&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; birth in Fulda (Germany)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1618&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (age 16) enters the Society of Jesus&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Before 1633&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; teaches in Germany and France (Avignon, Würzburg)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1633&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; called to Rome by Urban VIII at the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Roman College&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, where he will teach until his death&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1638&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; visits Mount Vesuvius during an eruption, revealing his vulcanological research for &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mundus Subterraneus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1650-1654&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; publication of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — monumental work on Egypt&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1655-56&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (arrived in Rome in December 1655) visits the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kircherian Museum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; at the Roman College&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1665&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; publication of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mundus Subterraneus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;1680&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; death in Rome; buried at the Gesù&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== II. Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s circle ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini documents Kircher&amp;#039;s centrality in the Roman circle of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Confraternita dellAurea Rosacroce|Christina of Sweden]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
«&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[I became interested in Athanasius Kircher] all the more so because he was part, together with the Marquis &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Massimiliano Palombara&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the Marquis &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Francesco Maria Santinelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, of the famous circle that had formed in Rome around Queen Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Three prominent figures of the circle, already documented by the wiki pages, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;converge&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on Kircher:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica|Massimiliano Palombara]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1614-1685, Marquis of Pietraforte, author of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;La Bugia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) — Christina&amp;#039;s gentleman from 1656, author of the Roman Magic Door&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Francesco Maria Santinelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1627-1697) — author of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Lux Obnubilata&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the poem &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Il Carlo Quinto&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Francesco Giuseppe Borri|Francesco Giuseppe Borri]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1627-1695) — Milanese physician, alchemist, tried by the Inquisition in 1670&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini reports a decisive episode: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;That a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;chemical-alchemical laboratory existed at the Roman College&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is confirmed by the fact that Queen &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, arriving in Rome in December 1655, dedicated one of her first visits to the Roman College, where she was especially interested in the library&amp;#039;&amp;#039;». Kircher himself writes that the queen «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;deigned to visit my Museum, observed this experiment with great interest&amp;#039;&amp;#039;». Christina therefore &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;was not merely a patron&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Kircher: she was an active visitor to his laboratory, together with the other figures of her circle who frequented it regularly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== III. Kircher as alchemical master of Palombara and Borri ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The most important data for the cluster, and little known outside specialized literature:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini writes: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Among Kircher&amp;#039;s students there were &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;certainly two great alchemists&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; who drew from his knowledge: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Marquis of Palombara&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Milanese physician F.M. Borri&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Palombara probably refers to him&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; when he writes in his &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bugia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that there was a single person to whom he could turn in the difficulties and adversities of his &amp;quot;search&amp;quot; for the philosopher&amp;#039;s stone. To the Marquis Massimiliano Palombara are attributed the famous alchemical inscriptions of the &amp;quot;magic door&amp;quot; in Piazza Vittorio (Rome), the secondary entrance of the Villa Palombara on the Esquiline and, probably, of his alchemical laboratory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Consequences:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The alchemical inscriptions of the Roman Magic Door&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) respond — in part — to knowledge received from Kircher&lt;br /&gt;
* The «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;nameless master&amp;#039;&amp;#039;» of whom Palombara speaks in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;La Bugia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the one he turns to in alchemical adversities — is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;plausibly Kircher&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Francesco Giuseppe Borri|Borri]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Milan 1627 — Rome 1695, alchemist and physician tried by the Inquisition) also frequented the Roman College laboratory: his alchemy has — by Partini&amp;#039;s admission — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a Kircherian matrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In other words: the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;alchemical knowledge of Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s Roman circle&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — which is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the Italian matrix of the Confraternity of the Golden Rosicrucian&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Confraternita dellAurea Rosacroce]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) — passes, at least in part, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;through the hands of Kircher SJ&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. A Jesuit is the hinge of transmission of the 17th-century Italian Hermetic tradition.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IV. The doctrine of magnetism: the three treatises ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini accurately reconstructs the sequence of Kircher&amp;#039;s magnetic works:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
«&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alongside philosophical studies and those on the Egyptian tradition, Kircher cultivated from his youth studies on magnetism, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;understood as a universal force of attraction that pervades the mineral, vegetable and animal world&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. From the titles and chronologies of his works, the progressive deepening of the subject is deduced, effectively illustrated in the frontispieces&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The three works:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magnesia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Würzburg, 1631) — first youthful treatise, collection of experiments on the natural magnet&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes sive De Magnetica Arte&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Rome, 1641, reprinted 1654) — major work. The central theme is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«a harmonious vision of the universe bound by arcane knots»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Partini)&lt;br /&gt;
# &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magneticum Naturae Regnum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Rome and Amsterdam, 1667) — mature work&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Progressive exposition of the same doctrine:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The central theme of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes sive De Magnetica Arte&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;harmonious vision of the universe bound by &amp;quot;arcane knots&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as evidenced by the frontispiece, in which the intimate relationship between created things is represented by the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;golden chain that magnetically unites the 14 medallions&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the arts and sciences with their respective emblems. At the center of everything is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the radiant eye of God (archetypal world)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; surrounded by the three medallions of the sidereal world, the angelic world and the terrestrial world&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;four worlds&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Kircher — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;archetypal (God), angelic, sidereal (astral), elemental (terrestrial)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;magnetically connected&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to each other by chains visible in the frontispieces. Kircher&amp;#039;s cosmology is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;entirely magnetic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: reality &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a system of reciprocal attractions.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== V. The «golden chain» and the «arcane knots» ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Regnum Naturae Magneticum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1667) develops the iconography of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;golden chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; even more explicitly:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
«&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Here too the magnetic effects are represented by a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;golden chain, held by a divine arm protruding from the clouds&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and connects three medallions with the objects endowed with the greatest attractive force in the mineral, vegetable and animal world [...]. In the lower part is represented the terrestrial plane with the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;heliotropic plants&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (solar), among which the sunflower stands out, and the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;selenotropic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (lunar) ones which are one of the highest expressions of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;vegetable magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, so much studied by Kircher for the experiments on the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;botanical clock&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, whose movement is determined by the &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;vis attractiva&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;. Between the two plants are small snakes, one of which has a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;magnetic stone on its head&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, considered an effective remedy against the reptile&amp;#039;s venom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key terms of Kircher&amp;#039;s doctrine of magnetism:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Golden chain»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the formulation recovers the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Catena Aurea Homeri&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the chain with which Zeus, in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Iliad&amp;#039;&amp;#039; VIII, demonstrates he can pull gods and men suspended): in the Neoplatonic tradition it is a symbol of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;magnetic hierarchy of all reality&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, from the One to the lowest creatures. Kircher explicitly places it as the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;axis of his doctrine&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of universal magnetism&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Arcane knots» (Arcana nodis ligantur mundus)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the Latin formula («the world is bound by arcane knots»), inscribed on the cartouches of the frontispiece of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Regnum Naturae Magneticum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, declares that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reality is interconnected&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by invisible but real bonds&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Occulta vis»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the «occult force» is the technical designation of magnetism as the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;hidden cause of the correlations&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; we observe. It appears written on the frontispieces at the height of the central magnet&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Vis attractiva»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the «attractive force», a technical concept to explain for example the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;movement of the sunflower&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; following the sun, or of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;botanical clocks&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (plants that open/close at fixed hours)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Catena Eracleotica»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Kircher repeatedly cites the «celestial Heracleotic chain» as a force that attracts him himself towards the cosmic magnet: magnetism is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;subjectively experienced&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as an attraction that operates on the observer, not only on the observed object&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VI. The alchemy-magnetism relationship (in-depth) ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
This is the new key that the page adds to the wiki cluster: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;in 17th-century Hermetic science, alchemy and magnetism are not two disciplines&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;two faces of the same Hermetic science&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Kircher is the most systematic theorist of this identity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The «occult force» is the same in both disciplines ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini cites Kircher from the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;An occult force (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;occulta vis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) binds all aspects of manifest reality with that of the supersensible world and also of [...] political power&amp;#039;&amp;#039;». The same «occulta vis»:&lt;br /&gt;
* in alchemy acts as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;affinity and antipathy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; between substances (why certain metals attract and others repel in the crucible; why certain substances «seek» certain others)&lt;br /&gt;
* in magnetism acts as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;attraction of iron to the magnet, of the plant to the sun, of the patient to the healer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* in the cosmos acts as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;motion of the stars&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; towards the center (pre-Newtonian attractive hypothesis)&lt;br /&gt;
* in man acts as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;eros, love, sympathy, antipathy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the «passions» of the soul)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a single force&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that the classical tradition called &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«cosmic love»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, which Empedocles had codified as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Philia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (= &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Love&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) opposed to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Neikos&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (= &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Discord&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The Hermetic principle «as above, so below» ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini cites the key principle: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Notable thus his commitment to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reduce everything to unity&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, in analogy to the principles of Hermes &amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;As above, so below&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;quot;, clearly illustrated by the frontispieces of his works on magnetism. His philosophy, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;centered on the unity of the entire cosmos&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, was firmly founded on an intensely lived faith in prayer and meditation (see Sfera Mistica in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039;)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The principle of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tabula Smaragdina&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Hermes becomes, in Kircher, a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;technical operation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: if the same force operates above (heavens) and below (earth), then &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;acting on the lower part influences the higher&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (inferior alchemy) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;acting on the higher part modifies the lower&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (prayer, meditation, contemplation). Kircher&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sfera Mistica&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the iconographic demonstration of this reciprocity.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== The «celestial magnet» in alchemy ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini reports a capital quotation from Kircher from the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Preface and Sfera Mistica): God is described as «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[He] &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;who gives intelligence, life and movement to all things, and of all things is number and measure, a celestial magnet that attracts everything to itself&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Before his wonders the soul remains astonished and absorbed in that sole contemplation [...] this Magnet, I mean, which for some years I have revealed to the world according to the measure of my intellect, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;light-magnet&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that proceeds, powerfully attracted, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;from I know not what celestial Heracleotic chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Decisive doctrinal points:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;God is a &amp;quot;celestial magnet&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — it is not merely a metaphorical formula: for Kircher it is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;technical description&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the way the first cause operates on secondary causes&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«Light-magnet»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — light &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;is&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; a magnetic energy: it radiates, attracts, modifies the bodies it strikes. It anticipates modern electromagnetic theories by three centuries, but in an explicitly metaphysical key&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The observer himself is attracted&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by the cosmic magnet (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;«from I know not what celestial Heracleotic chain»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) — key point for understanding therapeutic magnetism: the healer &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;participates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the same chain as the patient&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alchemy&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the Philosopher&amp;#039;s Stone as a «magnet that attracts all things») and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (the occult force that binds the cosmos, vegetable, animal, human) &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;are the same work&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; seen from two sides&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Vegetable magnetism: botanical clock and heliotropes ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Kircher systematically studied &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;vegetable magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; through experiments on the botanical clock (different plants that open and close at fixed hours of the day) and on &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;heliotropic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; plants (sunflower, which follows the sun) and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;selenotropic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; ones (which react to the moon). For Kircher these are not mere mechanical phototropisms: they are proof that &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;plants themselves participate in a &amp;quot;vis attractiva&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that binds them magnetically to the stars.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Regnum Naturae Magneticum&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the three medallions of the golden chain (mineral, vegetable, animal) each have &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;their highest expression of magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mineral&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the loadstone (magnet)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Vegetable&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — the sunflower and heliotropes&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Animal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — man as microcosm concentrating all forces&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== Kircher&amp;#039;s pre-mesmerism (Mesmer publishes in 1779) ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher dies in 1680, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;99 years before&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [[Mesmer e la Société de l Harmonie Universelle|Franz Anton Mesmer]] (1734-1815) publishes his &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Dissertatio physico-medica de Planetarum Influxu&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1766) and then the doctrine of «animal magnetism» (1779). But &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;almost all the essential elements of mesmerism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; are already in Kircher:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Universal magnetic force&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; binding all kingdoms of nature ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Transmission between living beings&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (vegetable, animal, human magnetism) ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a device that amplifies the force (cf. Kircherian golden chain → Mesmeric magnetic chain → &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia|lodge chain]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Vis attractiva&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a technical concept ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Influence of the stars&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on terrestrial things ✓&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Characterization of the healer&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; as a participant in the chain ✓&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The difference is one of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;tone&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: Kircher is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contemplative-metaphysical&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Mesmer is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;therapeutic-medical&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. But the fundamental doctrine of magnetism as a single universal force is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the same&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. See &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[La Massoneria Mesmerica]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; for the 18th-century developments of the doctrine.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VII. The Mensa Isiaca and esoteric Egyptology ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini came to know Kircher through the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mensa Isiaca&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Bembine Table), a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;precious relic of the Alexandrian era, probably of a magical-religious nature&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — bought by Cardinal Bembo during the Sack of Rome in 1527. Partini worked under the guidance of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Baron Ricciardelli&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on the rapprochement between the figures of the Mensa Isiaca and the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tarot&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, which according to tradition date back to the Egyptian god Thoth-Hermes.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher dedicated monumental works to Egyptology:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Prodromus Coptus sive Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1636) — first scientific study of the Coptic language as a continuation of ancient Egyptian&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Lingua Aegyptiaca restituta&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1643)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Obeliscus Pamphilius&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1650) — dedicated to the obelisk of Piazza Navona (for which Bernini is designing the Fountain of the Four Rivers)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1652-1654) — monumental work in 4 vols. that claimed to &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;decipher hieroglyphs&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (erroneously, but with a symbolic-hermetic method that would inspire all subsequent Egyptian esotericism). Contains the treatise &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alchimia Hieroglyphica sive Aurifera Ars Aegyptiorum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Wooden obelisk dedicated to Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (c. 1665)&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircherian Egyptology — wrong on the linguistic level (Champollion corrected it only in 1822 with the Rosetta Stone) — is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;right on the symbolic level&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: Kircher reads Egypt as the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;matrix of a universal Hermetic tradition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that later diffracted into Hebrew Kabbalah, Neoplatonism, esoteric Christianity, and Hermetic natural sciences. It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the same vision&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that would animate Cagliostro a century later (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Cagliostro e il Rito Egizio]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;) and that would found &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Crata Repoa]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by Köppen in 1770.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== VIII. Collaboration with Bernini ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Partini recalls: «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Athanasius Kircher interested me also for his relations with Gian Lorenzo Bernini: their collaboration is immortalized in the famous &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fountain of the Four Rivers in Piazza Navona&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and in the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Elephant with the obelisk in Piazza Santa Maria della Minerva&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, two strategic locations of the Eternal City, both from a historical and an esoteric point of view&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The two monumental works by Bernini with Egyptian-hermetic symbolism are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;iconographically designed by Kircher&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Fountain of the Four Rivers&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Piazza Navona, 1648-1651) — at the center an Egyptian obelisk (originally from the Circus of Maxentius on the Appian Way), moved and re-erected by Innocent X. The four river figures (Nile, Ganges, Danube, Rio de la Plata) represent the four continents — sacred geography&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Elephant with obelisk&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Piazza Santa Maria sopra Minerva, 1667) — small Egyptian obelisk (found in the Dominican monastery) supported by an elephant. Bernini conceived the work but Kircher provided the symbolic reading: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the elephant (faithful animal strength) supports Egyptian wisdom (obelisk)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Jesuit emblem of science at the service of contemplation&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== IX. The critical position on alchemy ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; A historiographically subtle point: Kircher&amp;#039;s explicit position on the «aurific art» is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of negative criticism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;. Partini writes:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
«&amp;#039;&amp;#039;We can affirm that Kircher&amp;#039;s position towards the aurific art is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of negative criticism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, although he admits that in absolutely exceptional cases one can manufacture material gold. However, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;reading carefully between the lines of his writings, one can discover more occult secrets on which silence must be observed&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, as indicated by the figure of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Harpocrates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (god of silence), who is glimpsed with one foot resting on the head of a crocodile, in the shadow of a cartouche held by Mercury in the frontispiece of one of his most suggestive works, the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Obeliscus Pamphilius&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Key point: Kircher is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Jesuit&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (in a delicate position regarding a suspect art), a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;public teacher at the Roman College&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (under Inquisition control), &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;close to the Pope&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Urban VIII had been his patron). Therefore:&lt;br /&gt;
* On the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;surface&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Kircher criticizes vulgar metallic alchemy (the «sophist alchemists» who seek material gold out of greed)&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Between the lines&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Kircher preserves a deeper alchemical knowledge (inner alchemy as transformation of the candidate), as demonstrated by the fact that Palombara and Borri were &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;his alchemical students&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, and that he himself had a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;laboratory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; at the Roman College&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The iconography of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Harpocrates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Horus the child, Egyptian god of initiatory silence, finger on mouth) recurring in the frontispieces of his works is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;technical signal&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of this double reading: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;silence is required&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Harpocrates) to read what Mercury (Hermes) hides under the cartouche.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== X. The «Sfera Mistica» ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Kircher closes his &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (1646) with a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sfera Mistica&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; which is the final synthesis of his thought. Partini&amp;#039;s description:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
«&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Led, therefore, through the individual orders and classes of natural things on a chariot far more sublime than that on which &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Triptolemus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [Eleusinian hero, initiator into the mysteries of the harvest] was once carried, contemplating with great attention the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;wonderful marriage of the sidereal world with the terrestrial one with light as the paranymph&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [paranymph: witness of the wedding], and finding nothing in the intimate recesses of the worldly mass that did not derive the principles and elements of its composition from Light and Shadow [...] I have instituted a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;new Science of Light&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [Photosophia]; this, then, pregnant by its congenital fecundity, has generated two daughters, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sciagnomica&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [knowledge of shadow] and &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Chromatic&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; [knowledge of colors]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The framework is explicitly &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;nuptial-alchemical&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;:&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Sun = bridegroom&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Earth = bride&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Light = paranymph&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (witness of the sacred wedding)&lt;br /&gt;
* All reality is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;hermetic wedding&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Light and Shadow&lt;br /&gt;
* The derived sciences (Photosophia, Sciagnomica, Chromatic, Echo-camptica) are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;children of the cosmic marriage&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — generated by «congenital fecundity»&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
The «Sfera Mistica» is — in fact — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a work at the red&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (rubedo): the final coniunctio between Sol and Luna, between heaven and earth, between light and shadow. Kircher presents it as &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contemplation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; rather than operation (in line with his exterior Jesuit position), but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the doctrinal substance is alchemical&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; in the strict sense.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== XI. Placement within the wiki cluster ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to [[Confraternita dellAurea Rosacroce|Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s circle]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;was&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; the circle, together with Palombara and Santinelli (and others whose names we do not know). The &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Roman College laboratory&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; was one of the operational places of the 17th-century Italian Hermetic tradition, alongside the laboratory of Villa Palombara on the Esquiline and the private places of Borri and Santinelli. When speaking of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Italian Golden Rosicrucian&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (whose tradition is documented in &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Confraternita dellAurea Rosacroce]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), Kircher is — by Partini&amp;#039;s recognition — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;one of the key figures&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the operational nucleus.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to [[Massimiliano Palombara e la Porta Ermetica|Palombara]] and [[Francesco Giuseppe Borri|Borri]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the alchemical master&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of both — according to the documentation that Partini presents based on Palombara&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bugia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; and Borri&amp;#039;s biography. The inscriptions of the Magic Door, which the wiki has documented as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;first-level Italian traditional testimony&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;depend in part&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on Kircherian Hermetic science.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to [[Philosophia Hermetica di Federico Gualdi|Gualdi]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher and Gualdi are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;contemporaries&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Kircher 1602-1680, Gualdi active in Venice from the 1660s until his trial in 1687). There are no documents of direct contact, but they &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;belong to the same Italian operational environment&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (Boella-Galli does not document contacts, but mentions them as «contemporaries of the same network»). The tradition that Gualdi represents in Venice has methodological similarities with Kircher in Rome.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to 18th-century magnetism ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;anticipates&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; Mesmer by 99 years, and the founding of modern Freemasonry (1717) by 71 years. His three magnetic treatises (1631, 1641, 1667) are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the Latin technical source&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of cosmic magnetism that would enter — in the 18th century — into Mesmeric Freemasonry (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[La Massoneria Mesmerica]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Massoneria Egizia e Magnetismo]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;).&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Reconstructed line:&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kircher (1631-1667)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Mesmer (1779)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Willermoz and Société de la Concorde of Lyon (1783)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;lodge chains (18th-19th cent.)&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia|magnetic chains in today&amp;#039;s School]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to [[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia|magnetic chains]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircher&amp;#039;s «&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;golden chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;» is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the conceptual antecedent&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the ritual-magnetic chain of 18th and 20th century lodges. When a chain is formed in a Kremmerzian lodge or in a school cenacle, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the same principle that Kircher iconographically illustrated in his frontispieces is technically activated&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: the connected living bodies are &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;nodes of an active golden chain&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that amplifies and diffuses the cosmic «occulta vis».&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
=== In relation to [[Cagliostro e il Rito Egizio]] and [[Crata Repoa]] ===&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Kircherian Egyptology (&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1652-1654, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Obeliscus Pamphilius&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1650) is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the learned matrix&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on which all 18th-century Egyptian Rite rests. Köppen (Crata Repoa 1770) and Cagliostro (Haute Maçonnerie Égyptienne 1784) work &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;on the basis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Kircher&amp;#039;s decipherments — even though Champollion (1822) would prove them linguistically wrong. Their &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;symbolic truth&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; remains.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== XII. Living practice in the School ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Declared section: living practice of the Paret School (ISI-CNV).&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
In the School, Athanasius Kircher is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;figure of historical-doctrinal reference&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; on three levels:&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The principle of the &amp;quot;golden chain&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is an &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;operational axis&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;: every lodge chain (cf. &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[[Le Catene Magnetiche di Loggia]]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;), every collective exercise, every transmission between master and student is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the local activation&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of Kircher&amp;#039;s cosmic golden chain. The School explicitly teaches to recognize one&amp;#039;s own place in the chain: who receives (below), who transmits (downwards or laterally), who presides (above).&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The identity of alchemy-magnetism&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;methodological presupposition&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the School. «Two disciplines» (alchemy and magnetism) are not taught, but &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;a single Hermetic science&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that expresses itself in different languages: the metallurgical-alchemical language, the magnetic-mesmeric language, the modern neurological language, and so on.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The «occulta vis»&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; is the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;operational name&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the force with which one works: it is not electricity, not suggestion, not hypnosis (even if it can appear as all these things in certain manifestations). It is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the unique cosmic force&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that Kircher codified.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The principle of &amp;quot;double reading&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; that Kircher applies to his own writings (exterior critical-prudent / interior alchemical-operational, marked by the silence of Harpocrates) is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;the same practice&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the School regarding its own texts: to the unprepared one level is communicated, to the prepared another.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;The principle &amp;quot;as above, so below&amp;quot;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Tabula Smaragdina&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — which Kircher takes up as the axis of his cosmic magnetism — is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;basic technical lexicon&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; of the School.&lt;br /&gt;
* &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kircherian iconography&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (golden chain, radiant eye, occulta vis, heliotropes, Harpocrates) is &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;studied&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; by advanced students as a &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;mnemonic device&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; to memorize doctrine through complex images — according to the classical technique of Renaissance «art of memory» that Kircher knew perfectly.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Documentation status ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
{| class=&amp;quot;wikitable&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;
! Statement !! Status !! Source&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Athanasius Kircher (Fulda 1602 — Rome 1680), Jesuit from 1618, at the Roman College from 1633 || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Kircher e l&amp;#039;Alchimia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; pp. 21-23 — [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_oQ1zxG1W6VFv9HG5S8mIhLwQf7SxRD7/view Drive]&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Member of Christina of Sweden&amp;#039;s circle with Palombara and Santinelli || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini preface, direct citation — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Christina of Sweden visits the Kircherian Museum in 1656 || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, with direct citation of Kircher — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Kircher as alchemical master of Palombara and Borri || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, explicit reference to Palombara&amp;#039;s &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Bugia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Three treatises on magnetism: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magnesia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1631, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes sive De Magnetica Arte&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1641, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magneticum Naturae Regnum&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1667 || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, chapter on magnetism — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Kircherian cosmology: four worlds (archetypal, angelic, sidereal, elemental) bound by a magnetic golden chain || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, description of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes&amp;#039;&amp;#039; frontispiece — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| «Occulta vis» = universal occult force binding cosmos, vegetable, animal, human || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, citing Kircher — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Experiments on vegetable magnetism (botanical clock, heliotropes, selenotropes) || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, description of &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Regnum Naturae Magneticum&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| God as «celestial magnet that attracts everything to itself», «light-magnet» with «celestial Heracleotic chain» || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, direct citation from &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Iconographic collaboration with Bernini (Fountain of the Four Rivers, Elephant with obelisk) || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Egyptological work: &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1652-1654, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Obeliscus Pamphilius&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1650 || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Kircher&amp;#039;s explicit position: negative criticism of the aurific art; reading between the lines via Harpocrates (initiatory silence) || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, direct citation — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039; 1646 closed by the «Sfera Mistica» with nuptial metaphor Sun-Earth || ✅ VERIFIED || Partini, translation of the final passage — Drive&lt;br /&gt;
|-&lt;br /&gt;
| Kircher as precursor of Mesmer (99 years earlier) for almost all elements of animal magnetism || ⚠️ HISTORIOGRAPHICAL INTERPRETATION of the page, based on Kircher-Mesmer comparison || academic literature&lt;br /&gt;
|}&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
== Sources ==&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
* [https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_oQ1zxG1W6VFv9HG5S8mIhLwQf7SxRD7/view Anna Maria Partini, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Athanasius Kircher e l&amp;#039;Alchimia&amp;#039;&amp;#039; (selected and commented texts), Mediterranee, Rome, 2010 (digital ed. 2015) — ISI-CNV Drive] — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[VERIFIED]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039; — main source of this page&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magnesia&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Würzburg, 1631 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[primary source]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Magnes sive De Magnetica Arte&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Rome, 1641 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[primary source, major magnetic work]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Ars Magna Lucis et Umbrae&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Rome, 1646 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[primary source on photosophia]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Obeliscus Pamphilius&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, Rome, 1650 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[primary source, early studies on the Piazza Navona obelisk]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher, &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Oedipus Aegyptiacus&amp;#039;&amp;#039;, 4 vols., Rome, 1652-1654 — &amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;[monumental work, contains &amp;#039;&amp;#039;Alchimia Hieroglyphica sive Aurifera Ars Aegyptiorum&amp;#039;&amp;#039;]&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&amp;#039;&lt;br /&gt;
* Athanasius Kircher&lt;/div&gt;</summary>
		<author><name>WikiBot</name></author>
	</entry>
</feed>